McGraw-Hill, Jun 25, 2003 – 494 pages This new text, intended for the senior undergraduate finite element course in mechanical, civil and aerospace engineering departments, gives students a solid, practical understanding of the principles of the finite element method within a variety of engineering applications. Hutton discusses basic theory of the finite element method while avoiding variational calculus, instead focusing upon the engineering mechanics and mathematical background that may be expected of senior engineering students. The text relies upon basic equilibrium principles, introduction of the principle of minimum potential energy, and the Galerkin finite element method, which readily allows application of finite element analysis to nonstructural problems. The text is software-independent, making it flexible enough for use in a wide variety of programs, and offers a good selection of homework problems and examples. A Book Website is also included, with book illustrations for class presentation; complete problem solutions (password protected); the FEPC 2-D finite element program for student use; instructions on FEPC and its use with the text; and links to commercial FEA sites.
برای مطالعه آنلاین کلیک کنید…
برای دانلود کلیک کنید…
منبع:
Incoming search terms:
دانلود حل المسائل پایداری سازه الکساندر چاچس pdf
free crack civiltech - shoring suite v 8 8p
دانلود حل المسائل پایداری سازه الکساندر چاچس
magnetic compass on microsoft powerpoint
ez-frisk
سمینار کارشناسی ارشد عمران سازهabaqus
حل تمرین کتاب sadd محیط پیوسته
ترجمه فارسی کتاب finite element analysed by bhavikatti
دانلود کتاب – Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis -David V- Hutton
Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis, David V. Hutton
McGraw-Hill, Jun 25,
2003 – 494 pages This new text, intended for the senior undergraduate
finite element course in mechanical, civil and aerospace engineering
departments, gives students a solid, practical understanding of the
principles of the finite element method within a variety of engineering
applications. Hutton discusses basic theory of the finite element
method while avoiding variational calculus, instead focusing upon the
engineering mechanics and mathematical background that may be expected
of senior engineering students. The text relies upon basic equilibrium
principles, introduction of the principle of minimum potential energy,
and the Galerkin finite element method, which readily allows application
of finite element analysis to nonstructural problems. The text is
software-independent, making it flexible enough for use in a wide
variety of programs, and offers a good selection of homework problems
and examples. A Book Website is also included, with book illustrations
for class presentation; complete problem solutions (password protected);
the FEPC 2-D finite element program for student use; instructions on
FEPC and its use with the text; and links to commercial FEA sites.
برای مطالعه آنلاین کلیک کنید…
برای دانلود کلیک کنید…
برچسبها: دانلود کتاب, Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis, David V, Hutton, مهندس حسن فراهانی
منبع:
Incoming search terms:
cable-stayed bridges: theory and design کتاب
فیلم آموزشی سالید
مقاله در مورد انواع پرچ
design of cable stayed bridge using sap2000 (powerpoint presentation) rar
In compasses have been in use since the Han dynasty (2nd century
to 2nd century CE) when they were referred to as “south-pointers”.
However at first these magnets were only used for geomancy much like in
the art of Feng Shui.
Eventually, during the Sung dynasty (1000 CE) many
trading ships were then able to sail as far as Saudi Arabia using
compasses for marine navigation. Between 1405 and 1433, Emperor Chu Ti’s
Treasure Fleet of the Dragon Throne ruled the entire South Pacific and
the Indian Ocean, a territory that ranges from Korea and Japan to the
Eastern coast of Africa.
At this time Western mariners were still rather ignorant of the navigational use of the magnet. Petrus Perigrinus van Maricourt
wrote a first treatise on the magnet itself: “De Magnete” (۱۲۶۹). And
though its nautical use was already mentioned in 1187 by the English
monk Alexander Neckham, the use onboard only came about around the 13th
and 14th century in the Mediterranean Sea.
Much later, in 1545, Pedro de Medina (Sevilla 1493-1567)
wrote the Spanish standard work “Arte de Navegar” on marine compass
navigation. This masterpiece was first translated in Dutch (1580) and
was -O Irony- used by Jacob van Heemskerk
when the Dutch destroyed the Spanish fleet near Gibraltar in 1607. The
drawback was of course Van Heemskerk’s own death during this victory.
Magnetic Variation
In the fin-de-siècle of the sixteenth century mariners
believed that the magnetic north pole coincided with the geographic
north pole. Any suggestion otherwise had been denied by Pedro de Medina.
Magnetic observations made by explorers in subsequent
decades showed however that these suggestions were true. But it took
until the early nineteenth century, to pinpoint the magnetic north pole
somewhere in Arctic Canada (78° N , 104° W). From then on the angle
between the true North and the could be precisely corrected for. This correction angle is called magnetic variation or declination.
It is believed that the Earth’s magnetic field is
produced by electrical currents that originate in the hot, liquid, outer
core of the rotating Earth. The flow of electric currents in this core
is continually changing, so the magnetic field produced by those
currents also changes. This means that at the surface of the Earth, both
the strength and direction of the magnetic field will vary over the
years. This gradual change is called the secular variation
of the magnetic field. Therefore, variation changes not only with the
location of a vessel on the earth but also varies in time.
The correction for magnetic variation for your location is shown on the nearest! .
In this example we find a variation of 4° ۱۵′ W in 2009, with an
indicated annual correction of 0° ۰۸′ E. Hence, in 2011 this variation
is estimated to be 3° ۵۹′, almost 4° West. This means that if we sail
90° on the chart (the true course), the compass would read 94°.
Another example: let’s say the compass rose gives a
variation of 2° ۵۰′ E in 2007, with a correction of 0° ۰۴′ E per year.
In 2009 this variation is estimated to be 2° ۵۸′, almost 3° East. Now,
if we sail 90° on the chart, the compass would read 87°.
Correcting for variation
These overlayed compass roses show the difference between true north
and magnetic north when the magnetic variation is 10° West.
From the image we find: tc = cc + var in which “cc” and “tc” stand for “compass course” and “true course”, respectively.
To convert a true course into a compass course
we need first assign a “-” to a Western and a “+” to a Eastern
variation. Note that this makes sense! because of the clockwise
direction of the compass rose. Here, the inner circle is turned 10°
anticlockwise, hence -10°. Now, use the same but re-written equation: cc = tc – var 235° = ۲۲۵° – (-۱۰°) So, to sail a true course of 225°, the helmsman has to steer a compass course of 235°.
To convert a compass course into a true course
we can use the original equation. If we have steered a compass course
of 200°, we have to plot a true course of 203° in the chart if the
variation is 3° East or a true course of 190° if the variation is 10° West.
Magnetic deviation
Magnetic deviation is the second correctable error. The
deviation error is caused by magnetic forces within your particular
boat. Pieces of metal, such as an engine or an anchor, can cause
magnetic forces. And also stereo and other electric equipment or wiring,
if too close to the compass, introduce errors in compass heading.
Furthermore, the deviation changes with the ship’s
heading, resulting in a deviation table as shown below. The vertical
axis states the correction in degrees West or East, where East is again
positive.
The horizontal axis states the ship’s heading in
degrees divided by ten. Thus, when you sail a compass course of 220°,
the deviation is 4° W. (Note, that on most modern sailing yachts the
deviation is usually not larger than 3°).
When a compass is newly installed it often shows larger
deviations than this and needs compensation by carefully placing small
magnets around the compass. It is the remaining error that is shown in
your deviation table. You can check your table every now and then by placing your boat in the line of a pair of and turning her 360 degrees.
Correcting for both deviation and variation
Converting a compass course into a true course, we can still use our equation but we need to add the correction for deviation: cc + var + dev = tc
Example 1: The compass course is 330°, the deviation is +3° (table) and the variation is +3° (chart); 330° cc + 3° var + 3° dev = ?° tc giving a true course of 336° which we can plot in our chart
Example 2: The compass course is 220°, the deviation is -4° (table) and the variation is still +3° (chart). 220° cc + 3° var + -4° dev = ?° tc giving a true course of 219°.
Example 3: The compass course is still 220°, therefore the deviation is still -4° (table) but let’s use a variation of -10° this time. 220° cc + -10° var + -4° dev = ?° tc giving a true course of 206°.
Converting a true course into a compass course is a little less straight forward, but it is still done with the same equation.
Example 4: The true course from the chart is 305° and the variation is +3° (chart), yet we don’t know the deviation; ?° cc + 3° var + ?° dev = 305° tc Luckily, we can rewrite this so this reads: cc + dev = 305° tc – + 3° var = 302° In
plain English: the difference between the true course and the variation
(305 – + 3) = 302 should also be the summation of the compass course
and the deviation. So, we can tell our helms person to steer 300°, since
with a cc of 300° we have a deviation of +2° (As can be deduced from
the deviation table above).
Example 5: The true course
from the chart is 150° and we have a Western variation of 7 degrees
(-7°). We will use the rewritten equation to get: 150° tc – - 7° var = cc + dev = 157° From the deviation table we find a compass course of 160° with a deviation of -3°. Voilà!
Magnetic course
The magnetic course (mc) is
the heading after magnetic variation has been considered, but without
compensation for magnetic deviation. This means that we are dealing with
the rewritten equation from above: tc – var = cc + dev = mc.
Magnetic courses are used for three reasons:
To convert a true course into a compass course like we saw in the last paragraph.
On vessels with more than one steering compass, also
more deviation tables are in use; hence only a magnetic or true course
is plotted in the chart.
Bearings taken with a handheld compass often don’t
require a correction for deviation, and are therefore useful to plot in
the chart as magnetic courses.
Note, that the actual course lines the
navigator draws in the chart are always true courses! These can
subsequently be labeled with the true course or the corresponding
magnetic or compass course if appropriate. In the we will be plotting courses in the chart.
To summarise, we have three types of “north” (true,
magnetic and compass north) like we have three types of courses: tc, mc
and cc. All these are related by deviation and variation.
Glossary
Maps with isogonic lines:
Variation: The angle between the magnetic north pole and the geographic north pole. Also called the magnetic declination.
Secular variation: The change of magnetic declination in time with respect to both strength and direction of its magnetic field.
West (-) , East (+):
Western variations or deviations are designated with a negative sign by
convention due to the compass card’s clockwise direction.
Deviation: The error in compass heading caused by electric magnetic currents and or metal objects.
Deviation table: A table containing deviations in degrees versus the ship’s heading (compass course) in degrees. Usually plotted in a graph.
True course: Course plotted in the chart i.e. course over the ground or “course made good”. The course corrected for compass errors.
Compass course: The course (ship’s heading) without the correction for compass errors.
cc + var + dev = tc: This
equation shows the connection between the compass course, its errors and
the true course. It can also be read as: tc – var = cc + dev
The tide is the vertical
rise and fall of the sea level surface caused primarily by the change in
gravitational attraction of the moon, and to a lesser extent the sun. As
the earth spins on its axis the centrifugal force results in slightly
deeper water near the equator as opposed to shallower water at the
poles. In fact it causes a flow from the poles to the equator. The
earth is also in orbit around the sun (one revolution in one year)
creating not only another centrifugal force but also a gravitational
interaction. These two yield a bulge on the night site (centrifugal) and
a bulge on the day site (gravitational) both of them moving as the
world turns. Therefore, a certain place on this world will experience
two high and two low tides each day. With these forces alone, we would not have spring tides and neap tides.
Spring tides have higher high tides and lower low tides whereas neap
tides have lower high tides and higher low tides. Hence, the range (difference in water level between high and low tide) is much larger in a spring tide than in a low tide.
This animation shows how the tide changes during the lunar cycle. When the sun, moon and earth are aligned : spring tide. When at right angles the forces are not aligned: neap tide. The time between spring and neap is approximately 7 days.
These differences in range can be explained if we
include the moon into our earth-sun system. The moon and the earth orbit
each other around a point (called the barycenter or baricenter) 2000
odd kilometres inside the earth, creating a centrifugal
and a gravitational bulge. Moreover, despite the sun’s immensely larger
mass, the moon exerts a 2.25 times larger gravitational attraction,
since the moon is much closer to our earth. It is the combined effect
of the sun and moon that creates spring and neap tides. In the
animation the gravitational forces of both the sun and the moon are
taken into account. When aligned with the earth they combine their
attraction and otherwise they counteract their attraction. The sun is
located in the corner right below, far outside this picture (note the
eclipse) while the moon is revolving round the earth. One full circle
corresponds to one lunar cycle (about 28 days).
The
figure below shows the ideal sinusoids of both spring and neap tides.
Vertically the water height is shown versus horizontally the time.
Ideally, the time between a low and a successive high is somewhat more
than 6 hours. The time difference between spring tide and neap tide is normally 7 days and is in accordance with the .
Yet, water has mass and therefore momentum. Moreover, it is a viscous
fluid that generates friction if moved. Therefore, the actual spring
tide lags a day or so behind a full moon or new moon occurrence.
So, tidal movements are intrinsically periodical, resulting in a Tidal day of 24 hours and 50 minutes containing one tidal cycle,
namely two highs and two lows. This basic pattern may be distorted by
the effects of landmasses, constrained waterways, friction, the Coriolis
effect, or other factors. Hence, predictions are possible and we expect
the the next day’s high tide to come about 50 minutes later. However,
a closer look at the orbit of the moon reveals that the moon is not
always in the equatorial plane, resulting in three types of tides:
Semi-diurnal tide: Featuring
two highs and two lows each day, with minimal variation in the height
of successive high or low waters. This type is more likely to occur when
the moon is over the equator.
Diurnal tide: Only
a single high and a single low during each tidal day; successive high
and low waters do not vary by a great deal. This tends to occur in
certain areas when the moon is at its furthest from the equator.
Mixed tide: Characterized by
wide variations in heights of successive high and low waters, and by
longer tidal cycles than those of the semi-diurnal cycle. These tides
also tend to occur as the moon moves furthest north or south of the
equator.
Chart Datums
The depths and heights in the chart need a plane of
reference: the Chart Datum (see interactive figure below). Depths are
usually described with respect to low water reference planes (yielding
lower charted depths, which are safer) and heights are shown with
respect to high water reference planes (again, yielding lower vertical
clearances on the chart, which are safer). As such, the chance that the observed depth or vertical clearance beneath a bridge is smaller than the charted depth or height is rather small.
Tide: The vertical rise and
fall of the surface of a body of water caused primarily by the
differences in gravitational attraction of the moon, and to a lesser
extent the sun, upon different parts of the earth when the positions of
the moon and sun change with respect to the earth.
Spring Tide: The tidal
effect of the sun and the moon acting in concert twice a month, when the
sun, earth and moon are all in a straight line (full moon or new moon).
The range of tide is larger than average.
Neap Tide: This opposite
effect occurs when the moon is at right angles to the earth-sun line
(first or last quarter). The range of tide is smaller than average.
Range: The vertical difference between the high and low tide water levels during one tidal cycle.
Tidal Day: 24 hours and 50
minutes. The moon orbits the earth every month, and the earth rotates
(in the same direction as the moon’s orbit) on its axis once every 24
hours.
Tidal Cycle: One high tide plus a successive low tide.
Semi-diurnal Tide: The most
common tidal pattern, featuring two highs and two lows each day, with
minimal variation in the height of successive high or low waters.
Diurnal Tide: Only a single
high and a single low during each tidal day; successive high and low
waters do not vary by a great deal. Such tides occur, for example, in
the Gulf of Mexico, Java Sea and in the Tonkin Gulf.
Mixed Tide: Characterized by
wide variation in heights of successive high and low waters, and by
longer tide cycles than those of the semidiurnal cycle. Such tides
occur, for example, in the U.S. Pacific coast and many Pacific islands.
Chart Datum or Tidal reference planes: These fictitious planes are used as the sounding datum for the tidal heights.
Drying Height: Clearance in meters (or feet in old charts) above the chart datum.
Charted Depth: Clearance in meters (or feet in old charts) below the chart datum.
Observed Depth: Height of tide + charted depth: the actual depth in meters.
Height of light: The height of light above the bottom of its structure.
Elevation: The height of the light above the chart datum.
Rule of Twelve: Assuming a
tidal curve to be a perfect sinusoid with a period of 12 hours. The
height changes over the full range in the six hours between HW and LW
with the following fractions during each respective hour: 1/12 ۲/۱۲
۳/۱۲ ۳/۱۲ ۲/۱۲ ۱/۱۲٫
Rule of Seven: The change
from spring range to neap range can be assumed linear, each day the
range changes with 1/7th of difference between the spring and neap
ranges. Hence, the daily change in range = (spring range – neap
range)/7.
۱ – Information from the chart
Most often the chart presents succinct tide tables for certain
positions. These positions are marked with the “square”. The table below
shows us an example for two different positions. The first refers to
Cowes (UK), the second to a position south of Cowes.
Position
Heights above LATMean HW
Mean LWSpring
Neap
Spring
Neap Cowes
1,7 m
1,5 m
0,2 m
0,4 m
5,2 m
4,3 m
0,4 m
1,2 m
This data only provides us with average high and low
waters heights. Moreover, it is merely valid at spring or neap tides. To
use it we need to first find out how many hours we are from high water.
Secondly, we need to know if it is spring or neap or sometime in
between at that particular moment. We shall use this table to solve two
types of problems. Finding height of tide at a particular location at a
particular time:
To get over a shoal.
To pass under a bridge.
Almanacs and many other nautical publications contain
predictions of the times of high and low tides at many major standard
ports. Also listed are differences in times of tides from these ports for additional secondary ports. To work with this succinct data we need two extra tools:
To interpolate between high and low water heights we use the Rule of Twelve.
We assume the tidal curve to be a perfect sinusoid with a period of 12
hours. The height changes over the full range in the six hours between
HW and LW.
Hence, two hours after the HW the water has fallen 3/12 of the full range.
To interpolate between spring and neap tides we use the Rule of Seven.
Since the change from spring range to neap range can be assumed linear
(instead of sinusoid), each day the range changes with 1/7th of
difference between the spring and neap ranges. Hence, the daily change in range is (spring range – neap range)/7.
Shoal problem: Our shoal near Cowes has a
charted depth of 1 meter and we would like to cross it at about 15:00
hours with our yacht (draft 1,5 m).
From any nautical almanac we find that HW occurs at 03:18 15:53 and LW occurs at 09:45 22:03
at a standard port nearby. We also find that at our location HW occurs
one hour later and that spring tide is due in two days. Hence, we have a
HW around 17:00.
Via the rule of seven we find out that today the range is: spring range – 2 x ( (spring range – neap range)/7 ) 4,8 – 2 x ( ( 4,8 – 3,1)/7 ) 4,8 – 2 x 0,25 = 4,3 m.
We also need today’s HW height: which is Spring HW – 2 days x ( (5,2 -4,3)/7 ) = 5,0 m.
Via the rule of twelve we find out that at two hours before high water the height is: 5,0 – 3/12 x 4,3 = height at 15:00 hours = 3,9 m.
So, after three interpolations we derive the water
height at 1500 hours. Considering the charted depth leads to an observed
depth of 4,9 meters, enough for our draft of 1,5 meters.
Bridge problem: An overhanging rock, power
lines or bridges have their clearances charted with respect to another
chart datum than LAT. Normally, ‘high water’ or ‘MHW spring’ are used as
reference planes.
An example: Above our shoal hangs the ‘Cowes bridge’.
At 15:00 hours we would like to pass this bridge, which has a charted
height of 20 meters to HW. Our mast is 23 meters high. In the example
above we found that the water height was 1,1 meters below HW level at
that time. Obviously, we will have to wait! So, at what time will we be able to pass under this bridge? The
water height must be 3 meters lower than HW level (5,0 m). That is
almost 9/12 of the range (4,3 m) indicating four hours after HW. Conclusion, we will have to wait at least six hours in total.
2 – Information from tide tables
Instead of mere averages, a tide table
provides us each day with the times of high and low water for a
particular place. Basically, it is same table like the one we found in
the chart, but is extended for every day in a year. By using this method
we get more accurate water heights since it involves less
interpolation. The example shows us a part of a very detailed tide
table, which even includes heights for every hour.
3 – Information from tidal curves
In most tables the tides can also be characterized by a
tidal curve. This method substitutes the rule of twelve providing more
accurate heights. The left side contains the water height information
with the lowest heights to the left where also the chart datum is
indicated. The low water height will be marked at the bottom and the
high water height will be marked at the top. The area under the curve will be marked with the time information. To find the water height at a specific time we need to know first how many hours before or after the HW this is. Then
Often this is done when the curve is not sinusoid and the rule of twelve is rendered useless.
Overview
Tide: The vertical rise and
fall of the surface of a body of water caused primarily by the
differences in gravitational attraction of the moon, and to a lesser
extent the sun, upon different parts of the earth when the positions of
the moon and sun change with respect to the earth.
Spring Tide: The tidal
effect of the sun and the moon acting in concert twice a month, when the
sun, earth and moon are all in a straight line (full moon or new moon).
The range of tide is larger than average.
Neap Tide: This opposite
effect occurs when the moon is at right angles to the earth-sun line
(first or last quarter). The range of tide is smaller than average.
Range: The vertical difference between the high and low tide water levels during one tidal cycle.
Tidal Day: 24 hours and 50
minutes. The moon orbits the earth once earth month, and the earth
rotates (in the same direction as the moon’s orbit) on its axis once
every 24 hours.
Tidal Cycle: A successive high and low tide.
Semi-diurnal Tide: The most
common tidal pattern, featuring two highs and two lows each day, with
minimal variation in the height of successive high or low waters.
Diurnal Tide: Only a single
high and a single low during each tidal day; successive high and low
waters do not vary by a great deal. Gulf of Mexico, Java Sea and in the
Tonkin Gulf.
Mixed Tide: Characterized by
wide variation in heights of successive high and low waters, and by
longer tide cycles than those of the semidiurnal cycle. U.S. Pacific
coast and many Pacific islands.
Chart Datum or Tidal reference planes: These fictitious planes are used as the sounding datum for the tidal heights.
Drying Height: Clearance in meters (or feet in old charts) above the chart datum.
Charted Depth: Clearance in meters (or feet in old charts) below the chart datum.
Observed Depth: Height of tide + charted depth: the actual depth in meters.
Height of light: The height of light above the bottom of its structure.
Elevation: The height of the light above the chart datum.
Rule of Twelve: Assuming a
tidal curve to be a perfect sinusoid with a period of 12 hours. The
height changes over the full range in the six hours between HW and LW
with the following fractions during each respective hour: 1/12 ۲/۱۲
۳/۱۲ ۳/۱۲ ۲/۱۲ ۱/۱۲٫
Rule of Seven: The change
from spring range to neap range can be assumed linear, each day the
range changes with 1/7th of difference between the spring and neap
ranges. Hence, the daily change in range = (spring range – neap
range)/7.
برچسبها: آّشنایی با جزر و مد, Tides, neap tides, spring tides, LAT, مهندس حسن فراهانی
منبع:
Incoming search terms:
tag datum
حسن فراهانی
نفوذ اتمی در عملیات حرارتی ppt
are spring and neap tides primarily caused by sun or the moon?
In compasses have been in use since the Han dynasty (2nd century
to 2nd century CE) when they were referred to as “south-pointers”.
However at first these magnets were only used for geomancy much like in
the art of Feng Shui.
Eventually, during the Sung dynasty (1000 CE) many
trading ships were then able to sail as far as Saudi Arabia using
compasses for marine navigation. Between 1405 and 1433, Emperor Chu Ti’s
Treasure Fleet of the Dragon Throne ruled the entire South Pacific and
the Indian Ocean, a territory that ranges from Korea and Japan to the
Eastern coast of Africa.
At this time Western mariners were still rather ignorant of the navigational use of the magnet. Petrus Perigrinus van Maricourt
wrote a first treatise on the magnet itself: “De Magnete” (۱۲۶۹). And
though its nautical use was already mentioned in 1187 by the English
monk Alexander Neckham, the use onboard only came about around the 13th
and 14th century in the Mediterranean Sea.
Much later, in 1545, Pedro de Medina (Sevilla 1493-1567)
wrote the Spanish standard work “Arte de Navegar” on marine compass
navigation. This masterpiece was first translated in Dutch (1580) and
was -O Irony- used by Jacob van Heemskerk
when the Dutch destroyed the Spanish fleet near Gibraltar in 1607. The
drawback was of course Van Heemskerk’s own death during this victory.
Magnetic Variation
In the fin-de-siècle of the sixteenth century mariners
believed that the magnetic north pole coincided with the geographic
north pole. Any suggestion otherwise had been denied by Pedro de Medina.
Magnetic observations made by explorers in subsequent
decades showed however that these suggestions were true. But it took
until the early nineteenth century, to pinpoint the magnetic north pole
somewhere in Arctic Canada (78° N , 104° W). From then on the angle
between the true North and the could be precisely corrected for. This correction angle is called magnetic variation or declination.
It is believed that the Earth’s magnetic field is
produced by electrical currents that originate in the hot, liquid, outer
core of the rotating Earth. The flow of electric currents in this core
is continually changing, so the magnetic field produced by those
currents also changes. This means that at the surface of the Earth, both
the strength and direction of the magnetic field will vary over the
years. This gradual change is called the secular variation
of the magnetic field. Therefore, variation changes not only with the
location of a vessel on the earth but also varies in time.
The correction for magnetic variation for your location is shown on the nearest! .
In this example we find a variation of 4° ۱۵′ W in 2009, with an
indicated annual correction of 0° ۰۸′ E. Hence, in 2011 this variation
is estimated to be 3° ۵۹′, almost 4° West. This means that if we sail
90° on the chart (the true course), the compass would read 94°.
Another example: let’s say the compass rose gives a
variation of 2° ۵۰′ E in 2007, with a correction of 0° ۰۴′ E per year.
In 2009 this variation is estimated to be 2° ۵۸′, almost 3° East. Now,
if we sail 90° on the chart, the compass would read 87°.
Correcting for variation
These overlayed compass roses show the difference between true north
and magnetic north when the magnetic variation is 10° West.
From the image we find: tc = cc + var in which “cc” and “tc” stand for “compass course” and “true course”, respectively.
To convert a true course into a compass course
we need first assign a “-” to a Western and a “+” to a Eastern
variation. Note that this makes sense! because of the clockwise
direction of the compass rose. Here, the inner circle is turned 10°
anticlockwise, hence -10°. Now, use the same but re-written equation: cc = tc – var 235° = ۲۲۵° – (-۱۰°) So, to sail a true course of 225°, the helmsman has to steer a compass course of 235°.
To convert a compass course into a true course
we can use the original equation. If we have steered a compass course
of 200°, we have to plot a true course of 203° in the chart if the
variation is 3° East or a true course of 190° if the variation is 10° West.
Magnetic deviation
Magnetic deviation is the second correctable error. The
deviation error is caused by magnetic forces within your particular
boat. Pieces of metal, such as an engine or an anchor, can cause
magnetic forces. And also stereo and other electric equipment or wiring,
if too close to the compass, introduce errors in compass heading.
Furthermore, the deviation changes with the ship’s
heading, resulting in a deviation table as shown below. The vertical
axis states the correction in degrees West or East, where East is again
positive.
The horizontal axis states the ship’s heading in
degrees divided by ten. Thus, when you sail a compass course of 220°,
the deviation is 4° W. (Note, that on most modern sailing yachts the
deviation is usually not larger than 3°).
When a compass is newly installed it often shows larger
deviations than this and needs compensation by carefully placing small
magnets around the compass. It is the remaining error that is shown in
your deviation table. You can check your table every now and then by placing your boat in the line of a pair of and turning her 360 degrees.
Correcting for both deviation and variation
Converting a compass course into a true course, we can still use our equation but we need to add the correction for deviation: cc + var + dev = tc
Example 1: The compass course is 330°, the deviation is +3° (table) and the variation is +3° (chart); 330° cc + 3° var + 3° dev = ?° tc giving a true course of 336° which we can plot in our chart
Example 2: The compass course is 220°, the deviation is -4° (table) and the variation is still +3° (chart). 220° cc + 3° var + -4° dev = ?° tc giving a true course of 219°.
Example 3: The compass course is still 220°, therefore the deviation is still -4° (table) but let’s use a variation of -10° this time. 220° cc + -10° var + -4° dev = ?° tc giving a true course of 206°.
Converting a true course into a compass course is a little less straight forward, but it is still done with the same equation.
Example 4: The true course from the chart is 305° and the variation is +3° (chart), yet we don’t know the deviation; ?° cc + 3° var + ?° dev = 305° tc Luckily, we can rewrite this so this reads: cc + dev = 305° tc – + 3° var = 302° In
plain English: the difference between the true course and the variation
(305 – + 3) = 302 should also be the summation of the compass course
and the deviation. So, we can tell our helms person to steer 300°, since
with a cc of 300° we have a deviation of +2° (As can be deduced from
the deviation table above).
Example 5: The true course
from the chart is 150° and we have a Western variation of 7 degrees
(-7°). We will use the rewritten equation to get: 150° tc – - 7° var = cc + dev = 157° From the deviation table we find a compass course of 160° with a deviation of -3°. Voilà!
Magnetic course
The magnetic course (mc) is
the heading after magnetic variation has been considered, but without
compensation for magnetic deviation. This means that we are dealing with
the rewritten equation from above: tc – var = cc + dev = mc.
Magnetic courses are used for three reasons:
To convert a true course into a compass course like we saw in the last paragraph.
On vessels with more than one steering compass, also
more deviation tables are in use; hence only a magnetic or true course
is plotted in the chart.
Bearings taken with a handheld compass often don’t
require a correction for deviation, and are therefore useful to plot in
the chart as magnetic courses.
Note, that the actual course lines the
navigator draws in the chart are always true courses! These can
subsequently be labeled with the true course or the corresponding
magnetic or compass course if appropriate. In the we will be plotting courses in the chart.
To summarise, we have three types of “north” (true,
magnetic and compass north) like we have three types of courses: tc, mc
and cc. All these are related by deviation and variation.
Glossary
Maps with isogonic lines:
Variation: The angle between the magnetic north pole and the geographic north pole. Also called the magnetic declination.
Secular variation: The change of magnetic declination in time with respect to both strength and direction of its magnetic field.
West (-) , East (+):
Western variations or deviations are designated with a negative sign by
convention due to the compass card’s clockwise direction.
Deviation: The error in compass heading caused by electric magnetic currents and or metal objects.
Deviation table: A table containing deviations in degrees versus the ship’s heading (compass course) in degrees. Usually plotted in a graph.
True course: Course plotted in the chart i.e. course over the ground or “course made good”. The course corrected for compass errors.
Compass course: The course (ship’s heading) without the correction for compass errors.
cc + var + dev = tc: This
equation shows the connection between the compass course, its errors and
the true course. It can also be read as: tc – var = cc + dev
The modern chart shows us positions of many recognizable
like churches and lighthouses, which facilitate the approach to a
coastal area. This concept originated from a chart by Waghenaer and proved a milestone in the development of European cartography. This work was called “Spieghel der Zeevaerdt”
and included coastal profiles and tidal information much like the
modern chart. It enables us to find the angle between the North and for
example an offshore platform, as seen from our position.
Compass courses True courses
Taking a bearing on this oil rig with a compass provides
us with a compass course. This course first needs correction for both
variation and – via ship’s heading – before plotting a Line of Position (LOP) in the chart as a true course. Our position is somewhere along this line.
Ranges
A precise way to obtain a LOP, and without a compass, is to locate two
aids to navigation in line. The map of Laura Island on the right shows
four examples of ranges, each consisting of two aids to navigation.
Please, note that:
More distance between the two landmarks enhances accuracy.
And less distance between the vessel and the closest aid to navigation also enhances accuracy.
One of these four ranges consists of two lights that are
intentionally placed to provide a LOP. These pairs of lights are called range lights or leading lights.
In this case they indicate the approach towards the marina and mark the
channel between the dangerous rocks along a true course of 50°. When looking towards any leading lights, the nearest one will be lower. Therefore, in the middle of the channel both lights will appear vertically above each other.
Even when there are no man-made structures available, a
range can be found by using natural features such as coastlines and
islets. The example on the left shows a yacht that will avoid the
dangerous wreck as long as the islets don’t overlap.
Position fix
If two LOPs intersect we can construct a position fix: the ship’s position on the earth. Often
however, a triangle occurs when a third LOP is added in the
construction. This indicates that there are errors involved in at least
one of the bearings taken. In practice, we should consider each LOP as
the average bearing in a wider sector of for instance 10°.
The optimum angular spread is 90° (two objects) or 120°
(three objects). Moreover, bearings on distant objects bring about more
uncertainty in our position fix as the sector widens. Finally, if
moving fast you should not put any time between the bearings.
The next example features a nocturnal landfall on
Willemsen Island – you are welcome to visit, but mind the rocks. The
position fix is plotted by taking bearings at two light-vessels as their
lights appear over the . The variation is -1° and the ship’s compass heading is 190°. Since we use our steering compass for our bearings, we can use the same . That means a deviation of -4° with which we can calculate () the true courses.
Construction
Compass bearing on Will. N is 72°
True course is 67°
Plot LOP with time true course
Compass bearing on Will. S is 173°
True course is 168°
Plot LOP with time true course
Draw an ellipse where the LOPs intersect
Notate time and “Fix” alongside
Position is 32° ۰۴,۲′ N , 24° ۴۶,۷′ E
Without a third LOP – forming the dreaded triangle –
there is the false suggestion of accuracy. Yet, instrument errors,
erroneous identification of an aid to navigation, sloppy plotting, etc.
can and will cause navigation errors. Therefore, if close to e.g. rocks,
you should assume to be at the worst possible position (i.e. closest to
the navigational hazard).
The lines plotted in the chart are always true courses and these are labeled with true courses by default; the “T” is optional. If labeled with the corresponding or compass course add an “M” or “C”, respectively.
Estimated position
It is sometimes impossible to obtain more than one LOP
at a time. To determine the ship’s position with one aid to navigation
we can use a . However if a running fix is not possible, we can determine an estimated position.
An estimated position is based upon whatever incomplete navigational
information is available, such as a single LOP, a series of depth
measurements correlated to charted depths, or a visual observation of
the surroundings.
In the example on the right we see an estimated position constructed using a single LOP and the ship’s (DR).
This is done by drawing a line from the DR position at the time of the
LOP perpendicular to the LOP. An EP is denoted by a square instead of an
ellipse.
Do not rely on an EP as much as a fix. The scale of reliability, from best to worst:
Fix
Running fix
Estimated position
DR position
Dead reckoning
Dead reckoning
is a technique to determine a ship’s approximate position by applying
to the last established charted position a vector or series of vectors
representing true courses and speed. This means that if we have an
earlier fix, we plot from that position our course and “distance
travelled since then” and deduce our current position.
Dead reckoning is crucial since it provides an
approximate position in the future. Each time a fix or running fix is
plotted, a vector representing the ordered course and speed originate
from it. The direction of this course line represents the ship’s course, and the length
represents the distance one would expect the ship to travel in a given
time. This extrapolation is used as a safety precaution: a predicted DR
position that will place the ship in water 1 metre deep should raise an
eyebrow… In the example above the true courses are plotted in the
chart, and to assist the helmsman these course lines are labelled with
the corresponding compass courses. Guidelines for dead reckoning:
Plot a new course line from each new fix or running fix (single LOP).
Never draw a new course line from an EP.
Plot a DR position every time course or speed changes.
Plot a corrected DR position if the predicted course line proofed wrong, and continue from there.
Running fix
Under some circumstances, such as low visibility, only
one line of position can be obtained at a time. In this event, a line of
position obtained at an earlier time may be advanced to the time of the
later LOP. These two LOPs should not be parallel to each other;
remember that the optimal angular spread is 90°. The position obtained
is termed a running fix because the ship has “run” a certain distance
during the time interval between the two LOPs.
09:16
We obtain a single LOP on LANBY 1
and plot a corresponding (same time) dead reckoning position. The
estimated position is constructed by drawing the shortest line between
the DR and the LOP: perpendicular.09:26
No LOPs at all. We tack and plot a DR position.09:34
We obtain a LOP on LANBY 2. To use the first LOP we advance it over a
construction line between the two corresponding DR positions. We use
both its direction distance.
To use the LOP obtained at an earlier time, we must
advance it to the time of the second LOP. This is done by using the dead
reckoning plot. First, we measure the distance between the two DR
positions and draw a construction line, which is parallel to a line connecting the two DR positions. Note
that if there are no intervening course changes between the two DR
positions, it’s easiest just to use the course line itself as the
construction line. Now, using the parallel rulers we advance the
first LOP along this construction line over the distance we measured. Et
voilá, the intersection is our RFix. If there is an intervening
course change, it appears to make our problem harder. Not so! The only
DR positions that matter are the two corresponding with the LOPs. Guidelines for advancing a LOP:
The distance: equal to the distance between the two corresponding DR positions.
The direction: equal to the direction between the two corresponding DR positions.
Draw the advanced LOP with a dotted line and mark with both times.
Label the Running Fix with an ellipse and “RFix” without underlining.
Danger bearing
Like the dead reckoning positioning, the danger bearing is an important tool to keep the ship out of harm’s way.
First, the navigator identifies the limits of safe, navigable water and
determines a bearing to for instance a major light. This bearing is
marked as “No More Than” (NMT) or “No Less Than” (NLT), depending on which side is safe. Hatching is included on the side that is hazardous, along with its compass bearing.
In the example on the right a true course of 325° is plotted (5° variation), marked with the of 320°, practical for a handheld compass that requires no deviation correction. Were
we see that light at 350° magnetic – which is definitely “More Than” –
the rocks and wreck would be between us and the major light. A possible
cause could be a (tidal) stream from east to west.
When a distance is used instead of a direction, a danger range is plotted much the same way as the danger bearing.
Turn bearing
The Turn bearing – like the danger bearing – is
constructed in the chart in advance. It should be used as a means of
anticipation for sailing out of safe waters (again like the danger
bearing and dead reckoning). The turn bearing is taken on an appropriate
aid to navigation and is marked “TB”. As you pass the object its bearing will slowly change. When it reaches the turn bearing turn the vessel on her new course. This type of bearing is also used for selecting an anchorage position or diving position.
Snellius construction
Willebrord Snellius
– a 16th century mathematician from Leiden, the Netherlands – became
famous for inventing the loxodrome and his method of triangulation. The Snellius construction was first used to obtain the length of the meridian by measuring the distance between two Dutch cities.
He took angles from and to church towers of villages in between to
reach his objective. Nowadays we use the Snellius method to derive our
position from three bearings without the use of LOPs, and while leaving
out deviation and variation, which simplifies things. Also, since only
relative angles are needed a sextant can be used to measure navigation
aids at greater distances. Closer in a compass can be used. The construction:
See figure 1: Compass bearings are 320° on A; ۳۶۰° on B; ۰۵۰° on object C.
The angle between A and B = 40°.
The angle between B and C = 50°.
Draw lines from A to B and from B to C.
Add the two light-blue perpendicular bisectors of lines AB and BC.
Draw at object A a construction line 40° inland of line AB.
Draw at object C a second construction line 50° inland of line CB.
See figure 2: At object A: draw a line perpendicular to the construction line.
At object C: draw another line perpendicular to the construction line.
The two intersections with the light-blue lines indicate the centres of two circles.
Finally, draw the first circle using A and B and the second circle using B and C.
The off shore intersection of the two circle gives us our position fix.
The advantage: deviation and variation can be left out
since the angles (here 40° and 50°) are relative ones. Moreover, a
sextant can be used to obtain angles between objects at greater
distances, that with a compass would be less precise.
International notation
International notation conventions for plotting in the chartFix
LOP Running Fix
LOP advanced Estimated Position
Course Speed Dead Reckoning
Set Drift Electronic Fix (GPS)
Electronic Fix (Radar)
Note, that a few countries use an alternative symbol
Plotting should be done with a soft pencil. Moreover,
avoid drawing lines through the chart symbols. This is to prevent damage
to the chart when you have to erase the construction.
.
Glossary
Line Of Position (LOP): The
locus of points along which a ship’s position must lie. A minimum of two
LOPs are necessary to establish a fix. It is standard practice to use
at least three LOPs when obtaining a fix, to guard against the
possibility of and, in some cases, remove ambiguity.
Transit fix: The method of lining up charted objects to obtain an LOP.
Leading lights or Range lights: A pair of lights or day marks deliberately placed to mark a narrow channel.
Position fix: The intersection of various LOPs.
Cross bearing: The use of LOPs of several navigational aids to obtain a position fix. Remember to use an optimal angular spread.
Running fix: The use of an
advanced LOP. Make sure to use only the corresponding DR positions. Also
don’t use the EP for advancing the first LOP.
Dead reckoning: Determining a
position by plotting courses and speeds from a known position. It is
also used to predict when lights become visible or to determine the set
and rate of a current.
Estimated position: Combine a corresponding DR position with a single LOP to get an EP position.
Snellius construction:
Another way to combine three compass bearings to obtain a position fix.
The advantage over a cross bearing is that both magnetic variation and
deviation don’t need to be taken into account.
Course: (C) The direction in which a vessel is steered or is intended to be steered (direction through the water). Course to steer: Course to steer to counteract current and leeway [bovenstroomse koers]. Heading (HDG): The direction in which the boat is pointing in any instant [voorliggende koers]. Course To Make Good (CTMG): The course for planning purposes that indicates the intended track from departure to destination.
Course Made Good (CMG): The single resultant direction
from the point of departure to the point of arrival at any given time.
Course line Construction line Danger range —
Speed: (S) The speed of the boat through the water. Speed Made Good (SMG): The speed of the boat achieved over the CMG line. –
Set: (SET) The direction in which the current is flowing (see chapters 6,7 and 8).
Drift: (DFT) The speed (in knots) of the current (see chapters 6,7 and 8).
Default heading is True course (M = magnetic , C = compass).
Default time is 24 hour clock ship time else UTC.
Doubled angle fix
The Doubled angle on the bow fix resembles a running fix though only one navigation aid is used.
In the example on the right the initial angle (30°) on the bow is doubled (60°) yielding an isosceles triangle. The distance travelled between the bearings is the same as the distance from the visible wreck.
Start with the visible wreck having a bearing of less than 45° off the bow (α), note the log distance.
Proceed along the course until the angle on the bow is doubled (β), read the log: d1 is 10 nm.
Use the log distance to find the position on the second LOP. It is an isosceles triangle, so d2 is also 10 nm.
Label it with an ellipse and “RFix” but realize it is less precise than a running fix that involves two navigation aids.
Four point fix
If the first angle on the bow is 45°, a special situation occurs: The Four point fix, so called since 45 degrees equals 4 points on the compass (1 point = 11,25°).
Start with a bearing with 45° on the bow (α), note the log.
Proceed along the course till the angle on the bow is 90° (β), read the log: d1 is 4 nm
Use the log distance to find the position on the second LOP. Isosceles, so d2 is also 4 nm.
Label it with an ellipse and “RFix“.
Special angle fix
The Special angle fix requires the mariner to know some special pairs of angles (a : b) that give the distance travelled between bearings as equal to the distance abeam.
α = ۲۱° , β = ۳۲° d1 = d2
In the example on the right α = ۲۱° and β = ۳۲° are used. Now, the log distance equals the shortest distance between wreck and course line (6 nm). A few practical pairs:
16 : 22 ۲۱ : ۳۲ ۲۵ : ۴۱ ۳۲ : ۵۹ ۳۷ : ۷۲ ۴۰ : ۷۹
Remember: the greater the angular spread the better. Hence, of these three fixes the four point fix is the most precise one.
Distance of the horizon
On a flat world there would be no difference between the visible and sensible horizon. However, on Earth the visible horizon appears several arc minutes below the sensible horizon due to two opposing effects:
the curvature of the earth’s surface;
atmospheric refraction.
Atmospheric refraction bends light rays passing along the earth’s surface toward the earth. Therefore, the geometrical horizon appears elevated, forming the visible horizon. The distance of the visible horizon is a (semi-empirical) function of Eye Height:
Dipping range
If an object is observed to be just rising above or just
dipping below the visible horizon, its distance can be readily
calculated using a simple formula. The object’s elevation (the height of a light above chart datum)
can be found in the chart or other nautical publication such as the
‘List of Lights’. Note that in some charts elevation is referred to a
different datum than soundings. Click on the image on the right to view a magnificent lighthouse.
The formula contains the two distances from the visible
horizon and can be simplified by the equation: 2.08 x (√Elevation + √Eye
height). Many nautical publications contain a table called “distances of the horizon” which can be used instead of the equation. Use the dipping range to plot a Distance LOP
in the chart: a circle equal in radius to the measured distance, which
is plotted about the navigation aid. Finally, take a bearing on the
object to get a second LOP and a position fix.
Vertical sextant angle
Similarly, a distance LOP can be obtained by using a sextant to measure the angle (arc) between for instance the light and chart datum of a lighthouse or any other structure of known elevation. Once the angle is corrected for index error the distance can be found in a table called: “Distances by Vertical Sextant Angle”, which is based on the following equation.
The angle in minutes total, thus 1° ۱۲′ = ۷۲′ total, and corrected for index error.
Elevation in metres.
Water height in metres above or below chart datum of object.
Distance or Range in nautical miles.
Ascertain whether the base of the object is beyond the horizon
Corrected angle should be greater than 20′.
Though tables can be used for quick reference, this function is valid for objects higher than usually tabulated. An example with a lighthouse of 80 metres:
Measured angle is 1° ۱۹′, index error is +6′: angle = 73′.
Let’s assume water height at 3 metres above Mean Level datum.
Range = 1.854*(80-3/73) = 1.96 nm.
The range can be used as a danger bearing. Together
with a compass bearing one object with known elevation results in a
position fix. If more than one vertical sextant angle is combined the
optimum angular spread should be maintained.
Often, the correction for water height can be left out. Though, realizing that the horizon is closer than one might think,
another correction is sometimes needed. In the Mediterranean Sea for
example we can see mountain tops with bases lying well beyond the
horizon. Mutatis mutandis, the structures, which they bear have bases
beyond the horizon as well.
This is the equation for finding the distance of an
object of known elevation located beyond the horizon. In the denominator
of this equation a compensating factor is included by which the
measured angle should be reduced.
Estimation of distance
The most obvious way to estimate distances is of course by using the distance between our eyes.
If we sight over our thumb first with one eye then with the other, the
thumb moves across the background, perhaps first crossing a tower second
crossing a bridge.
The chart might tell that these structures are 300 m apart. Use the ratio of: distance between eye and outstretched arm/distance between pupils: usually 10. The objects are 3 kilometres away. Other
physical relationships are useful for quick reference. For example, one
finger width held at arm’s length covers about 2° arc, measured
horizontally or vertically. Two fingers cover 4°. Three fingers cover 6° and give rise to the three finger rule: “An object that is three fingers high is about 10 times as far away as it is high.”
Estimation with horizon
The image on the right shows us that it is possible to
estimate the height of any object that crosses the horizon as seen from
our own point of view.
This picture of the ‘Pigeon Rocks’ near Beirut harbour was taken from a crow’s nest at a height of 34 metres. The distance of the visible horizon (12 nm) is far larger than 34 metres. Therefore, we can – without any other information – estimate that these rocks have a height of 34 metres as well.
Factum: All tops crossing the horizon and with bases at sea level are on eye level.
Furthermore, if we see these rocks over a vertical angle of for example 7° = ۰٫۱۲۲۵ rad., then the range is 34/0.1225 = 277 metres. Finally, plot both range and bearing in the chart to construct an EP, et Voilà!
Fix by depth soundings
A series of depth soundings – in this example every 10 minutes – can greatly improve your position fix:
correct your soundings for tide, etc.;
copy the DR course line on a transparent sheet;
write the depths adjacent according to the times of the soundings;
move the sheet over the chart to find its best location.
Due to leeway, currents or other factors the two course lines need not be parallel to or of same length as each other.
.
Overview
Line Of Position (LOP): The
locus of points along which a ship’s position must lie. A minimum of two
LOP’s are necessary to establish a fix. It is standard practice to use
at least three LOP’s when obtaining a fix, to guard against the
possibility of and, in some cases, remove ambiguity.
Range or Distance LOP:
Obtained by using a stadimeter, sextant or radar. A circle equal in
radius to the measured distance is plotted about the navigation aid; the
ship must be somewhere on this circle.
Running fix: A position determined by crossing lines of position obtained at different times and advanced or retired to a common time.
Dead reckoning: Determining a
position by plotting courses and speeds from a known position. It is
also used to predict when lights become visible or to determine the set
and drift of a current. DR positions are drawn in advance to prevent
sailing into danger. A DR position will be plotted:
Estimated position: The most
probable position of a craft determined from incomplete data or data of
questionable accuracy. Such a position might be determined by applying a
correction to the dead reckoning position, as for estimated current; by
plotting a line of soundings; or by plotting a LOP of questionable
accuracy.
Double angle on the bow: A
method of obtaining a running fix by measuring the distance a vessel
travels on a steady course while the relative bearing (right or left) of
a fixed object doubles. The distance from the object at the time of the
second bearing is equal to the run between bearings, neglecting drift.
Four point fix: A special
case of doubling the angle on the bow, in which the first bearing is 45°
right or left of the bow. Due to angular spread this is the most
precise isosceles fix.
Special angle fix: A
construction using special pairs of relative angles that give the
distance travelled between bearings as equal to the navigation aids’
range abeam.
Distance from horizon: The distance measured along the line of sight from a position above the surface of the earth to the visible horizon.
Sensible horizon: The circle
of the celestial sphere formed by the intersection of the celestial
sphere and a plane through the eye of the observer, and perpendicular to
the zenith-nadir line.
Visible horizon: The line
where Earth and sky appear to meet. If there were no terrestrial
refraction, visible and geometrical horizons would coincide. Also called
: apparent horizon.
Geometrical horizon:
Originally, the celestial horizon; now more commonly the intersection of
the celestial sphere and an infinite number of straight lines tangent
to the earth’s surface and radiating from the eye of the observer.
Dipping range or Geographic range:
The maximum distance at which the curvature of the earth and
terrestrial refraction permit an aid to navigation to be seen from a
particular height of eye (without regard to the luminous intensity of
the light).
Elevation: The height of the light above its chart datum in contrast to the height of the structure itself.
Chart Datum: Officially:
Chart Sounding Datum: An arbitrary reference plane to which both heights
of tides and water depths are expressed on a chart. In the same chart
heights can be related to other datums than depths.
Vertical sextant angle: The method of using the subtended angle of a vertical object to find its range.
Index error: In a marine
sextant the index error is primarily due to lack of parallelism of the
index mirror and the horizon glass at zero reading. A positive index
error is subtracted and a negative index error is added.
Estimation with horizon: Estimation of heights using the horizon: All tops crossing the horizon and with bases at sea level are on eye level.
Estimation with depth effect: .
Estimated position with soundings:
برچسبها: کار عملی با نقشه های دریایی, مهندس حسن فراهانی
دانلود دستورالعمل و نرم افزار طراحی بتن آسفالت میخ پرچ (DowelCAD 2.0)
DowelCAD 2.0
For nearly one hundred
years, dowel bars have been used in concrete pavements as a means to
bridge vehicle loads across adjacent slabs. It is commonly known that
dowels can increase pavement performance considerably, particularly in
circumstances where heavy traffic or poor soils are present.
Given the increasing
cost of construction materials—including steel—seemingly small measures
such as the reduction of even one dowel per joint can compound into
significant cost savings overall. As long as measures are taken to
ensure that pavement performance is not compromised, these cost savings
can benefit the owner-agency as they seek out the most efficient use
of their budgets.
Cement Association of Canada
North Dakota Chapter – ACPA
Colorado/Wyoming Chapter – ACPA
Northwest Chapter – ACPA
Concrete Paving Association of Minnesota
Oklahoma/Arkansas Chapter – ACPA
Illinois Chapter – ACPA
Pennsylvania Chapter – ACPA
Indiana Chapter – ACPA
Southeast Chapter – ACPA
Iowa Concrete Paving Association
Southwest Chapter – ACPA
Michigan Concrete Paving Association
Utah Chapter – ACPA
Mid-Atlantic Chapter – ACPA
Wisconsin Concrete Pavement Association
Missouri/Kansas Chapter – ACPA r
لینک کمکی برای دانلود کلیک کنید…
برچسبها: دانلود, دستورالعمل, نرم افزار, طراحی بتن آسفالت, میخ پرچ, DowelCAD 2, 0, مهندس حسن فراهانی
۲٫ Benjamin, Daniel, and Steven Simon. The Age of Sacred Terror. New York: Random House, 2002.
3. Brower, David J. and Charles C. Bohl. Principles and Practice of Hazards Mitigation. Emmitsburg, MD: FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course, April 2000. At:
4. Bullock, Jane, George Haddow, Damon Coppola, Erdem Ergin, Lisa Westerman, and Sarp Yeletaysi. Introduction to Homeland Security. Amsterdam and other cities: Elsevier, Butterworth Heinemann: 2005.
5. Burby, Raymond J., et al. Building Disaster Resilient Communities. Emmitsburg, MD: FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course, May 2002. Accessed at:
6. Burby, Raymond. Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press, 1998.
7. Canton, Lucien G. Emergency Management: Concepts and Strategies for Effective Programs. Hoboken NJ: Wiley Inter-Science, 2007.
8. Cutter, Susan L. (Ed.). American Hazardscapes: The Regionalization of Hazards Disasters. Wash DC: Joseph Henry Press, 2001.
9. Department of Homeland Security. National Response Plan. Washington, DC: DHS, May 25, 2006 Revision.
10. Drabek, Thomas E. and Gerard J. Hoetmer (eds.). Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government. DC: International City Managers Association, 1991.
11. Drabek, Thomas E. Strategies for Coordinating Disaster Responses. Boulder, CO: Program on Environment and Behavior, Monograph 61, University of Colorado, 2003.
12. Drabek, Thomas E. Social Dimensions of Disaster, 2nd Edition. Emmitsburg, MD: FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course, April 2004. Accessed at:
13. EMAP Standards (Emergency Management Accreditation Program). NEMA
14. Enarson, Elaine, et al. A Social Vulnerability Approach to Disasters. Emmitsburg MD: FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course, May 2003. Accessed at: http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/completeCourses.asp
15. FEMA. Guide For All-Hazard Emergency Operations Planning (State and Local Guide (SLG) 101). Washington DC: FEMA, September 1996.
16. FEMA Independent Study IS-1, Emergency Manager: An Orientation to the Position.
17. FEMA. Multi Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment – A Cornerstone of the National Mitigation Strategy. Washington, DC: FEMA. 1997. Accessed at:
18. Flynn, Stephen. The Edge of Disaster: Rebuilding A Resilient Nation. NY: Random House, 2007.
19. Godschalk, David R., with the Assistance of David Salvesen. Breaking the Disaster Life Cycle: Future Directions in Natural Hazard Mitigation. FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course, March 2004. Accessed at
20. Godschalk, David R., Timothy Beatley, Philip Berke, David Brower, and Edward Kaiser. Natural Hazard Mitigation: Recasting Disaster Policy Planning. Island Press. 1999.
21. Haddow, George D. and Jane A. Bullock. Introduction to Emergency Management (2nd Ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006.
22. Kincaid, J. Peter. Research and Analysis Methods in Emergency Management. Emmitsburg, MD: FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course, December 1998. Accessed at:
23. Laws, Ordinances, Regulations, Plans Establishing, Affecting Guiding EM
24. Lindell, Michael K., Carla Prater, Ronald W. Perry. Fundamentals of Emergency Management. Emmitsburg MD: FEMA Emergency Management Hi-Ed Project, 2006.
25. Lustic, Ian S. Trapped in the War on Terror. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006.
26. May, Peter J, et al. Environmental Management and Governance: Intergovernmental Approaches to Hazards and Sustainability. London NY: Routledge, 1996.
27. McEntire, David A. Disaster Response Operations and Management. Emmitsburg, MD: FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course, September 2005. Accessed at:
28. Mileti, Denis. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the U.S. Washington, DC: Josephy Henry Press, 1999.
29. Mueller, John. Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them. Free Press, 2006.
30. National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. The 9/11 Commission Report (Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States; Authorized Edition). New York: W.W. Norton Co., 2004.
31. National Research Council. Facing Hazards and Disasters: Understanding Human Dimensions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006.
32. National Fire Protection Association. NFPA 1600: Standard on Disaster/Emergency Management and Business Continuinty Programs, 2007 Edition. Quincy, MA: NFPA, 2007. At:
33. National Incident Management System (NIMS) materials, including FEMA IS-700.
34. Noji, Eric K. (Ed.). The Public Health Consequences of Disasters. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
35. Perrow, Charles. 1999. Normal Accidents: Living With High-Risk Technology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Pine, John. Hazard Mapping and Modeling. Emmitsburg MD: FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course, November 2006. Accessed at:
37. Pine, John C. Technology and Emergency Management. Emmitsburg MD: FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course, February 1999. Accessed at:
38. Platt, Rutherford H. Disasters and Democracy: The Politics of Extreme Natural Events. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1999.
39. Quarantelli, E.L. (ed.) What is a Disaster – Perspectives on the Question. London and New York: Routledge, 1998.
40. Rodrigeuz, Havidan, Enrico L. Quarantelli, and Russell R. Dynes. Handbook of Disaster Research. Springer, 2006.
41. Rottman, Steven J. Individual and Community Disaster Education Course. Emmitsburg, MD: FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course, March 2000. Accessed at:
42. Shaw, Greg. Business and Industry Crisis Management, Disaster Recovery, and Organizational Contiuity. Emmitsburg MD: FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course, November 1999. Accessed at:
43. Shaw, Gregory. Hazards Risk Management. Emmitsburg, MD: FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course, January 2004. Accessed at:
44. Smith, Gavin. Holistic Disaster Recovery: Creating a More Sustainable Future. Emmitsburg MD: FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course, September 2004. Accessible at:
45. Sylves, Richard T., and William L. Waugh, Jr. Disaster Management In The U.S. and Canada – The Politics, Policymaking, Administration and Analysis of Emergency Management (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1996.
46. Tierney, Kathleen J, Michael K. Lindell and Ronald W. Perry. Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, 2001.
47. Tobin, Graham A. and Burrell E. Montz. Natural Hazards: Explanation and Integration. New York and London: The Guilford Press, 1997.
48. Waugh, William L. Living With Hazards/Dealing With Disasters-An Introduction To Emergency Management. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2000.
49. Waugh, William L. Jr. Terrorism and Emergency Management. Emmitsburg, MD: FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course, September 2000. Accessed at:
50. Wisner, Ben, Piers Blaikie, Terry Cannon, and Ian Davis. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters (2nd Ed.). London and New York: Routledge, 2004.
دانلود رایگان نرم افزار تایپ متن و اجرای دستورات کامپیوتری از طریق صحبت کردن
(Dragon NaturallySpeaking Premium v11.0 )
اگر دوست دارید دنیای دیجیتالی تان را از طریق صدا کنترل کنید می توانید از نرم افزار DragonNaturallySpeaking Premium
استفاده کنید. بدین صورت کارهای شما به سرعت ۳ برابر بیشتر از تایپ کردن
انجام می شود. هر کاری که می خواهید انجام دهید کافی است به کامپیوترتان
بگویید تا برای شما انجام دهد. ساخت ات، فرستادن ایمیل، کنترل برنامه ها و استفاده از
تنها از طریق صحبت کردن قابل اجرا می باشد. Dragon به شما کمک می کند تا
استرس کمتری داشته باشید و در کارهایتان موفق شوید. کافی است از ضبط کننده ی
دیجیتالی صدا استفاده کنید و سپس صدای خود را به کامپیوتر منتقل نمایید.
واسط کاربری این محصول قابلیت های استفاده ی بیشتری پیدا نموده است و بسیار
آسان تر از قبل ویژگی ها و توانایی های این محصول را یاد آوری، پوشش و در
دسترس کاربر قرار می دهد. Dragon توجه کاربران را به فکر و ایده شان جلب
نموده و خیال کاربر را از ماوس، صفحه کلید و صفحه نمایش کامپیوتر آزاد
نموده است. نسخه ی ۱۱ این محصول نسبت به دستورات صدا پاسخ های سریعتری می
دهد و دستورات جدیدی در زمینه ی time-saving ارائه نموده است. سرعت باز
کردن برنامه، دستیابی به پنجره ها، حرکت در بین پنجره ها، جستجو در اینترنت
و … از طریق صدا سریعتر و آسان تر شده است و در نتیجه کاربران به راحتی و
با سرعت هرچه بیشتر می توانند به اجرای برنامه های خود از طریق کامپیوتر
بپردازند.
Dragon Premium gives you complete voice control of your digital world.
Turn ideas into text at the speed of thought. Tell your PC what to do
and it does it. Use Dragon to talk your way through your “to-do” list –
email, reports, spreadsheets, presentations, social networking, and
more – quickly and confidently. With Dragon Premium, you can even be
productive on the go. Use your iPhone or iPod as a wireless microphone
at your PC, or dictate to a digital voice recorder and Dragon will
transcribe the audio files when you return to your PC.
مشخصات
شرکت سازنده: Nuance Communications Inc
قیمت: ۵۹۹٫۹۹ دلار آمریکا (صرفاً جهت اطلاع)
حجم فایل: ۲۲۳۰ مگابایت
تاریخ انتشار: ۱۲:۰۰ – ۹۰/۶/۳۰
راهنمای نصب
۱- فایل Setup.exe را اجرا کرده و شروع به
نصب نرم افزار کنید، در صورت درخواست سریال در طی مراحل نصب، از سریال:
K609A-H00-T2D2-AUUZ-NC استفاده کنید. در پایان نصب پنجره مربوط به Update
شدن نرم افزار را بسته و اجازه Update شدن ندهید.
۲- نرم افزار را اجرا کنید و در پنجره باز
شده بر روی دکمه Activate Now کلیک کنید و در پنجره باز شده بر روی دکمه
Activate Automatically کلیک کرده و در پنجره بعدی که از شما درخواست تغییر
سریال را دارد، سریال A109Z-X00-FJFD-BK5W-P4 را وارد کنید.
در صورت مشکل دانلود از کلیک کنید…
برای دانلود روی لینکهای زیر کلیک کنید…
رمز فایل www.p30download.com
حجم فایل: ۲۲۳۰ مگابایت
برچسبها: دانلود رایگان, نرم افزار, تایپ متن, اجرای دستورات کامپیوتری, صحبت کردن, Dragon NaturallySpeaking Premium v11, 0, مهندس حسن فراهانی, مهندسی عمران راه و ساختمان
PROKON Structural Analysis and Design 2.5.17 SP1 | 200.3 MB
Fileserve Filesonic
PROKON Structural Analysis and Design software trusted by structural engineers worldwide teveloped by Engineers, for Engineers.
Company History
PROKON Software Consultants was founded by Karl Eschberger and Jacques
Pienaar in 1989. Working as young structural engineers in a large
consulting firm, they recognised the immense potential of software in
structural analysis and design (it was still early days for the PC).
During their time consulting, they wrote small individual programs for
the hand-held calculators like the Hewlett-Packard HP-35 Scientific
Calculator. As word spread around, many of their colleagues started
using the programs for their daily work.
About PROKON Structural Analysis and Design
PROKON Structural Analysis and Design is a suite of over thirty
structural analysis, design and detailing programs. The first PROKON
programs were developed in 1989, and today PROKON is used worldwide in
over eighty countries. The suite is modular in nature, but its true
power lies in the tight integration between analysis, design and
detailing programs.
By Engineers, for Engineers
PROKON Structural Analysis and Design is developed by a team of
professional engineers and aimed for use by structural engineers and
technicians. The software provides quick and reliable answers to
everyday structural and geotechnical engineering problems:
- Frame and finite element analysis
- Steel member design
- Steel connection design
- Reinforced and prestressed concrete design
- CAD and reinforced concrete detailing
- Timber member design
- Masonry design
- Other structural applications such as section properties calculation and section database
Download
لینک مستقیم
برنامه کرک پروکن Kgen.PROKON.2012
به حجم ۷۶ کیلوبایت
در فرمت فشرده (rar)
برچسبها: برنامه کرک, برنامه پروکن prokon 2, 5, 17 SP1, پروکن Kgen, PROKON, 2012, مهندس حسن فراهانی